An Evaluation of Japan's Security Policies from A Neoclassical Realism Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20671158Keywords:
USA, Japan, China, Neoclassical RealismAbstract
The 21st century marks a shift in global economic and political power from the West to the Far East. In this context, the political and economic relations between the United States, the current holder of economic and political power, and regional states seeking potential power such as China, Japan, and South Korea, are examined from various perspectives. The aim of this article is to analyze, from a neoclassical realist perspective, the political and security relations of Japan, a regional and global partner of the globally hegemonic United States, with both the US and other countries in the region. Content analysis was used in the study. Data was obtained from secondary sources such as books, reports, and articles. Our main finding is that, from a neoclassical realist point of view, Japan's understanding of security has initiated a transformation process that will trigger political and military tensions in the region.
References
Atanassova‐Cornelis, E. (2011). The political and security dimension of Japan–China relations: strategic mistrust and fragile stability. Pacific Focus, 26(2), 165-187.
Beqa, M. (2017). Neoclassical Realism: Its Promises and Limits as a Theory of Foreign Policy. European Academic Research, 5(1), 316-330.
Bluebook, D. (2013). Japan’s Foreign Policy in Major Diplomatic Fields. Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan, 23-31.
Cha, V. D. (2000). Abandonment, entrapment, and neoclassical realism in Asia: the United States, Japan, and Korea. International studies quarterly, 44(2), 261-291.
Chiang, M. H. (2019). Contemporary China-Japan relations: the politically driven economic linkage. East Asia, 36(4), 271-290.
Fiammenghi, D., Rosato, S., Parent, J. M., Taliaferro, J. W., Lobell, S. E., Ripsman, N. M., & Narizny, K. (2018). Correspondence: Neoclassical realism and its critics. International Security, 43(2), 193-203.
Ford, I. V., & Arthur, P. (2009). Denting the Hub, or Strengthening the Spokes? A Neoclassical Realism Analysis of New Security Trends in the Pacific.
Gegeshidze, L. (2024). Grand strategy of Japan. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 6(11), 353-366.
Götz, E. (2021). Neoclassical realist theories, intervening variables, and paradigmatic boundaries. Foreign Policy Analysis, 17(2), oraa026.
Grimes, W. W. (2003). institutionalized inertia. International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, 353.
Hughes, C. W. (2016). Japan’s ‘resentful realism’and balancing China’s rise. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9(2), 109-150.
Ito, R. (2023). A neoclassical realist model of overconfidence and the Japan–Soviet Neutrality Pact in 1941. International Relations, 00471178231218567.
Jerdén, B., & Hagström, L. (2012). Rethinking Japan's China policy: Japan as an accommodator in the rise of China, 1978–2011. Journal of East Asian Studies, 12(2), 215-250.
Katagiri, N. (2020). Shinzo Abe's Indo-Pacific Strategy: Japan's recent achievement and future direction. Asian Security, 16(2), 179-200.
Kozub-Karkut, M. (2019). Neoclassical Realism and Foreign Policy Analysis–A Possible Way of Integration?. Teoria Polityki, (3), 201-227.
Lai, Y. M. (2013). Nationalism and power politics in Japan's relations with China: a neoclassical realist interpretation. Routledge.
Lobell, S. E. (2009). Threat assessment, the state, and foreign policy: a neoclassical realist model. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy, 42-74.
Sørensen, C. T. (2013). Is China becoming more aggressive? A neoclassical realist analysis. Asian perspective, 37(3), 363-385.
Watai, Y. A. (2017), Neoclassical Realist Account for Abe’s Attempt at the Constitutional Revision. The International Conference on Japan & Japan Studies 2017 Official Conference Proceedings.
Zakowski, K. (2023). A neoclassical-realist analysis of Japan’s stance on cross-strait relations. Stosunki Międzynarodowe–International Relations, 2(25), 25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Sciences Dimensions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.